Elon Musk is suspect. To me, he's nothing but a wolf in sheep's clothing with empty, and false, promises of "free speech" and "getting rid of bots". No doubt Elon Musk is a likeable guy. But I find something is definitely is definitely off about this guy... Polluting unsuspecting Western minds with this pernicious religion of Scientism

He's a staunch follower of the gnostic/Luciferian doctrine of Transhumanism and has wonky goals of being an "interplanetary species". A member of the Masonic/Rosicrucian-led institution, the Royal Society. Cannibalist and world-renowned atheist, Richard Dawkins, is also a member of this propagandist institution.

Musk's father was president of Technocracy Canada (also have an American branch). The Trilaterals also espouse technocratic aims. Many Trilateralists have penetrate the highest offices of the United States. One famous being Zbigniew Brzezinski

If you look carefully at the aims of Technocracy, you'll know that the New International Economic Order (NIEO) that was ratified by the United Nations in 1974 looks almost like a textbook copy of Technocracy Inc's goals. Patrick M Wood has a great book explaining the goals of Technocracy, United Nations Sustainable Development, and Private Public Partnerships.

I'm not fooled or easily persuaded. He's got his followers and worshippers cucked, in my opinion. The SpaceX fandom base is right there where he needs them. Nothing but fandom. They are enamoured by him. He's got his scoundrels fighting on Twitter against this pathetic "wokeness" ideology. Tim Pool seems to be head over hills about Musk.

To the ruling elite, it's not about Left vs Right, liberal vs Conservative, Democrats vs Republicans etc... The elite will use whichever political side is most useful to them. They fund both sides

Keep the scoundrels fighting amongst one another so that Technocrats like Bill Gates, Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos (father worked for DARPA), WHO, GAVI, Big Pharma can continue doing their work of selling off your nation, freedoms, and privacy. SpaceX is no doubt an aid to technocracy. Building and launching surveillance and tracking systems into space. Information grid system of satelites and military systems.

He just bought Twitter. Solidifying what HG Wells said that "the larger Big Business grows the more it approximates towards Collectivism" through mergers, monopolization, buyouts, big purchases and the mobilization of workers. It's socialism for the rich, and crumbs for mass man. His quest for getting rid of bots and his emphasis on "human authentication" fits in line with the goals of ID2020 and the 4IR. He's also said questionable things regarding AI and supercomputers which I'm not going to get into.

I'm not fooled at all. I'm on guard. Don't be so gullible

Lo!… JEHOVAH OKCULT BIBLE [JOB] WITNESS My Highly Official… 1921 [IV] 9 Ether U.S. Ægyptian QUANTUM HARRELL TECH [QHT] SKY MILITARY GOVERNMENT [GLOBAL STRATOCRACY] PROPHETS from 2223 [IX] 9 Ether MU America [MA = ATLANTIS]… in 2022 [VI] San Diego County [D.C.]… SUPERNATURALLY Engineering Apocalyptic [SEA] 1968 [VI] 9 Ether ALUHUM ANUNNAGI WAR EVENTS [WE] Against Lost 2022 [VI] America

A major component of the Great Reset agenda is the implementation of a worldwide digital identity. The first step to realize this goal is to convince the public that digital identity programs are a “human right” worth fighting for.

remember like 3 months ago when you had to show a qr code to be able to sit down in a restaurant and leftists online were like yes this is good

Deny deny deny, then sip your champagne

A province Petain would approve of

Palantir in your pocket

Canada not glorious, not free

I want to start a conversation about technocracy but I don’t want to touch the popular misinformation that claims it’s when Silicon Valley Tech Bros Inject AI Panopticons Into Your Brain or whatever. 

Specifically I want to talk about how the appeal to expertise is a common yet unrecognized system used to stabilize post-revolutionary discoordination.

A lot of leftist critiques of authority come from an unacknowledged technocratic position while insisting they are democratic. Specifically those with an “X group should lead the organization of Y thing because X group are the experts on Y related subjects.” formula. 

(Because by definition technocracy is the leadership of experts wherein governance is the recognition of problems to be solved, and where policy is determined using scientific analysis of various solutions.) 

That we should educate a particular group until a democratic majority understands the “correct” solution is still a fundamentally technocratic position. 

Example: If a community votes to burn coal and poison their local water supply attempting to directly intervene is not a recognition of their democratic organization. Saying that we should listen to indigenous people “because they are experts and their traditional techniques are scientifically shown to have better results” is a technocratic position.

Democracy is the recognition of “what people want to do” and not “what we have learned” and thus claiming communism is superior because it better reflects the conclusions of social and material science is not a democratic position.

(Although the same material decisions can be attained via a majority support that aligns with scientific analysis. Such things are only recognized because it is popular, not because it is effective.)

A definitely-too-simple but concise and illustrative example of what a fully-technocratic government would be is to imagine that Congress was barred from ever passing any laws, and instead only controlled net funding levels and some oversight powers, while every area of government would be structured just like the Federal Reserve, with independent agencies making regulations and a committee of experts that advises and restrains them. 

I think this is far from ideal and would run into tons of problems and don’t support it, but honestly would be coin toss in comparison to our current system (low low bar I know). But still, the *concept* of technocracy is I think clear from the thought exercise, copy paste the federal reserve onto every branch of the act of governing and you are gesturing in the right direction.

Death cult posing as Ontario Science (death) Panel

I told my mother I wish I would die before humanity steps on mars. When we stepped on the moon it was the work of a whole country, if we step on mars its because a singular person has gotten so rich that they have access to unprecedented technology and power

The spell factory

Meanwhile…

https://t.co/uLG8IXBApD?amp=1

https://archive.ph/2021.11.29-185144/https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2021/11/11/who-global-pandemic-treaty/

https://edition.cnn.com/2022/03/09/investing/cryptocurrency-executive-order/index.html

https://www.ft.com/content/88f47c48-97fe-4df3-854e-0d404a3a5f9a

https://archive.ph/qZJ3d

https://www.forbes.com/sites/suzannerowankelleher/2022/02/24/national-vaccine-quietly-rolled-out/?sh=1c2272ed6be6

https://archive.ph/2022.03.04-164112/https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/03/technology/surgeon-general-covid-misinformation.html

Canada's Lady Macbeth

My main criticism of the supposedly sophisticated opinion that Brave New World is profounder than Nineteen Eighty-Four: Huxley believes in his own utopia insofar as he shows it to succeed in eliminating negative affect; Orwell, more realistically, understands that in even the most thoroughgoing technocratic-pharmacological regime, negative affect will persist as a part of the human condition, and the regime, therefore, will work to channel the energies of hate for its own purposes.

https://youtu.be/i4mT3-jm838

Reset as ritual